Sprick (2009) defines a classroom
management and discipline plan as “a framework that supports a variety of
rituals, routines, rules, consequences, and motivational techniques” (p. 107). This
framework is essential as the techniques can be used to ensure that students
are academically engaged and emotionally thriving. Educators should consider
every aspect of their classroom management and discipline prior to school
starting and then make adjustments based on their students’ unique needs.
Level of structure is the first
aspect educators should reflect on- “will you need to develop a low-, medium-,
or high-structure management plan by taking into account your personal needs
and the collective needs of your students?” (Sprick, 2009, p. 108). Sprick
states that these two factors shape the level of structure which would best
work in a classroom. On a personal note I had a bit of hesitation when I first
read this. Sprick focuses a great deal on ensuring that the educator’s personal
needs and preferences are considered. He does reason that an educator must be a
positive and energetic force and can only do so if they are comfortable in the
classroom. However I am reluctant to place as much priority on this factor as
it could potential keep the student from receiving the true level of structure
they need. I would then say that these factors do not necessarily hold equal
weight, but rather the students’ needs take priority. This argument errs in a
similar trajectory to the age-old question, what comes first the chicken or the
egg, as it is hard to unpack which factor should be considered first.
Regardless, I agree with Sprick’s notion that educators should constantly be
reflecting on their own pedagogical beliefs and personal preferences.
In completing Sprick’s (2009)
Classroom Management and Discipline Planning Questionnaire (Figure 3.1, p. 111),
it confirmed my own reflections that as an educator I can would be able to
respond to the demands of a
low-structure management plan. I then completed the Management and Discipline
Planning Questionnaire (Reproducible 3.1), which will follow this post. This questionnaire
was completed based on the fictional classroom context posted previously. The
results of this questionnaire state that my risk factors are medium and my
students would benefit from either a medium-structure or high-structure
management plan. It is important to consider which level of structure to first
implement as it is much easier to move to a lower structure than to try an add
structure. In this classroom context I would plan to begin my school year with implementing
a high-structure management plan. I would then frequently reflect on the
structure and plan to evaluate my students’ needs for structure at least once a
month to ensure I am providing them with the appropriate level of structure necessary
optimize growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment